The Bizarre Ordinariness of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy uses normal everyday human events, and blows them up to a galactic scale to the point of ridiculous parody. Even in the opening pages this idea is embodied, as a man who is stubbornly refusing to move out of his house so the government can build a highway through it, witnesses the destruction of Earth so the intergalactic government can build a highway through it. It asks hard-hitting questions such as, if AI gained sentience, could it also develop depression? If you asked a calculator what the meaning of life is, what would it respond with? Even in a highly advanced society, brimming with technological achievements that we couldn’t even dream of, would the government still be as superficial and corrupt as it is now? The answer to all of these questions is yes, probably, and certainly, all at once.


The hilarity of Hitchhiker’s Guide stems from how completely absurd so many of these situations may seem, despite them making perfect sense in the strange world they inhabit. We would like to believe that the more advanced a civilization becomes, the more they shed the trappings of animalistic and immoral behavior. It’s nice to think that humanity will eventually become enlightened the more technological progress we make, and that many of our current problems will be ‘solved’ in due time. However, Hitchhiker’s Guide recognizes that while we may evolve in some ways, we will forever remain shackled to error, laziness, greed, envy, and all the other imperfect things that make us humans, and make aliens also humans, but in a funny rubber suit.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sickness and Madness in Frankenstein

Despite the many differences between the 1931 film version of Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein and the novel it’s based on, there is one thru line that deeply connects the two, specifically found in the main character of Victor Frankenstein. Victor Frankenstein is driven insane. It is remarkable how often the timid, bordering on naïve Victor of the novel falls ill with no discernable cause other than fright. The first time he constructs his monster he succumbs to sickness and mad ravings for a whole Winter, and afterward he takes two years to recover. He never seems to fully recover from these bouts either, as upon re-entering his homeland he can’t help but wax poetic about the mountains and valleys, something he previously didn’t seem to care enough to mention. Victor’s insanity is compounded by his profound guilt as the bodies of his family members pile up around him. His decision to destroy his second creation before completion is curious.   His reasoning that a breeding popu...
Read more

The Animal in the Vampire

Throughout “Interview with a Vampire”, the strongest dichotomy that I saw was that of man’s primal, animal nature versus his greater conscience, and which of the two serves as more important. Every character struggles with these opposing forces in some way, and there is no clearer divide between the two than the differences between the protagonist and the antagonist of the book, Louis and Lestat. Louis is very conscious of his human nature. Louis eats only animals for most of his ‘early’ vampire years, almost having fainted as Lestat tried to set him up for his first kill. Lestat, in contrast, loves the thrill of hunting humans, or seducing them, befriending them, getting them to love him, all before committing an ultimate betrayal, and reveling in the sadistic nature of his actions. Lestat is, in outward appearances, a primal version of man. This version of man is driven by simple things, a desire to eat, a desire to look wealthy and garner social status, and a desire to complete...
Read more

New Weird

Weird carries with it a variety of meanings that have been granted to it over the centuries. The most interesting contexts for it, however, are those it has been used for most recently, and the contrast between the Old Weird literature and the New Weird. The Weird of Weird Tales magazine published in the 1920’s was mostly concerned with new sorts of alien and existential horrors. They were less preoccupied with monsters of old and more interested in the idea of hidden societies. The true difference between the monsters in the likes of Count Dracula and Frankenstein, and the unknowable entities of the world of Lovecraft, is one of metaphor. Monsters of the Victorian era were representations of very human failings. Frankenstein is a fairly straightforward metaphor of the dangers of scientific progress without thought for the moral philosophy behind it, and a tale of a neglectful father/creator figure. The monsters that live in the pages of the Weird, however, are much more obscure t...
Read more